In the 1980s, a surprising increase in HIV / AIDS rates was observed due to blood infections and the use of incorrectly positioned syringes. Lethal injections have long been widespread in the mid-1990s and are harmful to Canada. To combat the effects of overdose and HIV infection in Vancouver, several public agencies have shed light on and endorsed the idea of a supervised injection site (SIF). However, the first accredited SCS was launched in Canada in 2003. In addition, the health consequences of lethal injection and opioid bans wreak havoc on the community in the form of crime, threats to social safety nets, and health problems. Health. An interesting model that helps combat this wave of opioid epidemics by minimizing their impact is called Safe Consumer Site (SCS). There are several other interesting names called Safe Injection Sites (SIF), Overdose Prevention Centers, Medically Supervised Vaccination Centers, and Repair Pavilions.
War on Drugs
The war on drugs has continued, and academics operate in ethnically inconsistent routines, refusing to reduce illicit drug practices and exacerbating the risks associated with illicit drug practices. He criticizes the federal drug program for being it. However, federal officials argue that the Justice Department’s hostile attitude toward the use of prohibited drugs has results and they relentlessly oppose the formation of supervised injection sites as an innovative response to combat substance abuse.
SIF’s or SCS’s
SIF or SCS is a site that includes a clean and safe area where addicts can consume pre-obtained drugs under the supervision of trained personnel. These are legally licensed facilities where drug addicts can intervene and have certified medical personnel or companies to safely use drugs in order to prevent a fatal overdose. These sites provide counseling and treatment services, providing a safe indoor environment for proper injection methods and rapid response in the event of an overdose.
According to Car et al. (2010), safe injection sites were established to provide drug users with a clean and safe environment, as a solution to the increase in drug overdose and to prevent the transmission of the disease. According to academic studies, the main objective of the areas of safe consumption is to reduce the transmission of blood infections, increase citizen security, improve access to social and health services and finally the death of drug users, reduce rates and morbidity. The profitability of these sites is an issue when government financing options are a concern. It is a fundamental issue since it affects the health of citizens and the use of dollars by taxpayers.
The goal of SCS
The goal of SCS is to provide vulnerable people with a place where they can consume in a restricted, safe and clean way as they would anywhere else. Supervised trained personnel equipped with prepared naloxone, opioid overdose antidotes. This site helps people participate in both therapeutic and convenient purposes.
Data from the US shows that only one secure SCS has been operating there since 2014, according to the Pen Wharton Public Policy Initiative. The center provided medical assistance to 100 opioid addicts and verified more than 2,574 injections during the 2014-2016 year. In addition, patients received a survey form prior to consumption, and the survey revealed that over the past 30 days, approximately 67.4% of users were used to disposing of syringes safely. Therefore, in a safe place of consumption, we properly dispose of 1,725 syringes and prevent approximately 92.2% of unsafe and unsanitary injections.
By reviewing the statistics, we can see that SCS is a practical and cost-effective approach. However, previous data explained that safe consumption areas continue to be a controversial issue within the country as it faced long-standing public opposition. According to data reported by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the annual cost of the entire opioid healthcare sector is approximately $ 75 billion. However, according to San Francisco statistics reports, $ 1 spent on SCS can save about $ 2.33, for a total savings of $ 3.5 million a year. According to a report from the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, establishing a safe consumer area in Baltimore can save about $ 6 million a year in Baltimore. Taking into account the social and economic interests of SCS, Canada has decided to create three SCS sites in the city. Montreal was also in the process of establishing multiple SCS in 2017.
There are several harm reduction approaches recommended long ago by healthcare professionals. These include needle and needle replacement programs that can include the spread of viral infections such as HIV, Hepatitis B, and Hepatitis C. Due to the influence of the federally approved needle exchange program, the concept of Supervised injection is highly provocative and controversial. However, the SCS is much more controversial and has been controversial for the past few years. According to a study by Kora et al. (2017), SCS is plagued with social shame. Some community members argue that establishing an SCS can hinder community development and negatively affect local businesses.
Furthermore!
Some political organizations do not support the areas of safe consumption. They believe that SCS should not be funded or dissolved. A news article published by Tasker (2019) summarizes the Conservative Party’s attitude towards SCS. They encourage SCS to promote drug use, unite drug users in the same community, disrupt normal behavior in local communities due to increased crime, and discourage drug users from participating in addiction treatment programs. Inconsistently, there was no evidence to investigate whether SCS would reduce or increase crime in the surrounding area.
Based on these academic studies, state and federal governments should fund safe use areas in high drug use areas. You will save government money in the long run. It prevents the transmission of the disease. You will reduce the excess among drug users, and addicted drug users may be able to use the professional help provided by their SCS to recover from their addiction. The impact of the life-saving movement of this concept and the benefits of cost savings will give way to the future.